Sorry I haven’t been around for a few days, but I hope to get back on track this week with some stuff, including, hopefully, an interview with a current WWE main eventer.
There’s a lot of ground I wanted to cover from an eventful few days for WWE:
. I was as uninterested in Cyber Sunday as I have been for any WWE pay per view in recent memory. It would be easy to blame my disinterest on the fact that this was the second WWE PPV in the same month, but, honestly, that wasn’t a factor. WWE is just total dullsville to me these days. And after being a hardcore fan for most of my life, it’s a bit of a scary prospect. I can’t tell you when the last time was that I watched a Raw or Smackdown from beginning to end. What’s more, I don’t get the impression I’m missing much. WWE is just in a rut, and the ratings reflect that. I’m not sure what the answer is, short of just blowing everything up and coming forward with a complete outside-of-the-box concept for the product. Raw in particular is absolutely paint-by-numbers these days.
. I’ll tell you what the answer is not: Banning the use of the term “wrestlers” and replacing it with “entertainers,” as has been reported on sites including ProWrestling.Net and PWTorch.com. I’ll never get Vince McMahon’s shame in being what he is – a wrestling promoter. I’ve never had a big problem with the term “superstar,” but “entertainer” is ridiculous, especially in the course of calling a match. It breaks all sense of disbelief and would be tantamount to the cast of The Office referring to each other as “actors” during the show. More than just stupid, it shows the complete obliviousness of WWE decision-makers. Rome is burning, and they’re worried about Triple H being called a wrestler. Yeah, that’ll fix the ratings.
. I’ve got mixed feelings on the Cyber Sunday concept. I actually used to enjoy going on WWE.com and placing my votes, and then watching the show with other people who did the same and seeing who among us got our picks. But since they replaced the free online voting with phone texting, I – and imagine a majority of past voters – were left out in the cold. Without a horse in the race, the pay per view wasn’t nearly as fun to watch. That said, I don’t really blame WWE for trying to create a new revenue stream. If some fans are willing to plunk down 99 cents per vote, more power to WWE for taking their money.
. I’m also on the fence about the whole “choose the opponent” stip. Inevitably, it means weeks of television build up for a particular option will be rendered completely moot. For example, fans had a possible Triple H-Kozlov match-up shoved down their throats for weeks, only for it to culminate Sunday with a shrug of the shoulders from Kozlov when he didn’t get many votes. The same goes for Finlay and Mark Henry, who got a lot of TV time in recent weeks as possible challengers to the ECW title. This really isn’t so much a complaint as it is an observation. When I used to vote [for free] for Cyber Sunday, I enjoyed having a say in the night’s line up.
. Batista has become the king of the completely forgettable world title victories. Not since he beat Triple H at WrestleMania 21 to begin his first reign have any of his world title wins felt significant. That was again the case at Cyber Sunday, where I felt his “feud” with Chris Jericho was not at all built up well, and was something of an after thought to the bigger question of who would referee the match. I don’t think WWE is doing any favors by continuing to give Batista the world title in less-than-historic circumstances. It likely means we won’t be seeing Batista win the big one at WrestleMania, which always gives a world title reign an extra bit of momentum.
. What’s more, Batista is just not the answer. He’s got a lot going for him, and should definitely remain in the main event mix, but seeing him with the world title is just too familiar. It’s the proverbial re-arranging of the deck chairs on the Titanic.
. I’ve got a big problem with a C.M. Punk match being one of three options for fans to choose from at Cyber Sunday. Not surprisingly, fans went with a match featuring the hot Cryme Tyme act instead, meaning that Punk – who just a few weeks ago was the company’s world heavyweight champion – would be left out of competing on his third consecutive WWE pay per view. He hasn’t wrestled a match on a PPV since August. That’s nothing short of disgraceful, especially in a company that could desperately, desperately use some young, new main event stars. Even more absurdly, Punk was featured on the promotional poster and commercials for the event.
. I’d love for the rumors to be true about Steve Austin returning for a one-night-only match at WrestleMania. The seeds have been planted for a few possible match ups for Stone Cold, including JBL and Chris Jericho. That said, Austin is also not the answer to WWE’s woes. In fact, I think, for too long, WWE has not handled the presentation of Austin well. He becomes more of a parody of himself every time he appears – doing little more than spitting out his tired catch phrases, doling out Stunners, and drinking beer. WWE, and Austin himself, have lost site of the many nuances that made Austin such a blast to watch once upon a time. For “Stone Cold” at his best, pick up the 1997 WWE Home Video release, “’Cuz Stone Cold Said So.”