One Night Stand: Stale & Unnecessary, But Could Be Fun

This Sunday’s WWE pay per view features matches between the Undertaker and Edge, Randy Orton and Triple H, and John Cena and JBL.
Wait a minute, didn’t I already write this post two weeks ago?
"One Night Stand" feels more like a stale relationship with no end in sight. I’ve made this point many times, but WWE definitely needs to freshen up its top feuds. Hopefully, we’ll be getting just the shake up we need with the upcoming draft lottery. But there’s actually yet another pay per view before then, June’s Night of Champions. So it may be possible that we see some of these combinations on pay per view yet again in just a few weeks.
My hope for Vince McMahon’s big announcement last Monday was that it would involve a reduced price for One Night Stand, the third WWE pay per view in five weeks. One Night Stand was originally designed as an ECW revival pay per view, and received wide praise in its first two years. But it has long since lost its relevancy and needs to be removed from the pay per calendar, just as WWE wisely did with January’s New Year’s Revolution. Asking fans to spend $160 on pay per views eight weeks is insane.
That said, I’ll give WWE credit for making ONS feel unique by featuring all extreme-rules matches. Unlike TNA, WWE is fairly disciplined in how often it features quirky stipulation matches, so a card loaded with Stretcher, I Quit, Falls Count Anywhere and Last Man Standing matches is something to look forward to.
I’m especially intrigued by the tables, ladders and chairs match between Taker and Edge. We know how great the Rated R Superstar can be in this kind of match, and Taker always gives it his all and tries to innovate in the ring. And we're pretty much guaranteed a new world champion.
I’ll probably check it out.



I’d like to take this opportunity to school some newer wrestling fans on some of the sport’s insider terms:

