By Tom Rock
So the Patriots accused the Jets of tampering. That’s too bad. I hope it doesn’t ruin what has been a cordial and friendly rivalry between the two franchises over the years. Don’t let Deion come between you, Jets and Pats!!! Take a page from Entourage and Hug It Out, guys!
Seriously, the Patriots may think the Jets did them wrong by ALLEGEDLY letting Branch and his people in on what they were offering as a possible trade. But all that did was help the Patriots by driving the price up to a first-rounder from Seattle. The Jets may have actually helped the Patriots, who were likely never going to come to terms with Branch anyway. Sigh. Just one more sub-plot in the stew of stories that always lead up to a Jets-Pats game.
No comment from the Jets yet about the claim, and I’m not holding my breath for one. They don’t comment on good news, so they’ll probably hunker down on this one. So what we have is two teams that don’t address the media in a dispute over a player that neither team now controls. I love this job.
Speaking of Branch, kudos to Bobby G. for getting the word out on his blog next door. Not only did Glauber blog on the Branch news, he blogged about blogging it earlier in the day on Monday. Wow. That’s blog-tastic!
Finished Week One at 9-7 in my picks thanks to the Vikes and the Chargers. Not bad for a week with so many upsets. Not sure how Staple and Glauber made out yet. I may be new here, but I can tell you it’s a marathon, not a sprint. Unless I have the early lead. In that case, eat my dust!
It’s become clear that I need to address my grading system. Thank you for many of the points that were made here, and those with intelligent arguments were appreciated. You are correct, there was no need for a comeback. It just felt like they came back from the change in momentum. Anyway, here’s what I was thinking in giving the offense a C-plus:
If I had to give the quarterback a grade, it would be an A. If I had to give the running backs a grade, it would be a D. If I had to give the o-line a grade, it would be a B or a B-minus. I packed those together like a snowball and came up with a C-plus.
Perhaps those who criticize forget the first and third quarters when the Jets were a combined 0-for-4 on third-down conversions and would have led by only 13-0 instead of the important 16-0 had Kerry Rhodes not intercepted Collins on the first play of the second half to set up a field goal. Even then, the Jets couldn’t punch it in from 1st-and-goal at the 10, having to settle for 3. The Jets couldn’t budge the ball forward when they needed to most (ok, second-most; they did during the game-winning drive), as the Titans were coming back and the Jets needed drawn-out possessions that ate yards as well as clock. Instead they had a three-and-out, then a three-and-fumble. And don’t forget, cornerback Chris Hope got his hand on the game-winning touchdown pass to Chris Baker. If he picks that and returns it 99 yards for the winning score for the Titans, it’s a whole other story.
Now ask me if the offense is better than last year’s, and the answer is definitely. Compared to 2005, anything other than a shutout deserves an A on offense. But considering the competition and some of the problems (penalties on the line, miscommunication that led to sacks and a costly turnover), I think this performance was above average but not exceptional.
I stand by my C-plus. Though I’m not above taking kickbacks to bump it to a B-minus.