OK then... Time to go through yesterday's game.
Feels like there are always a few of these pics after each loss, doesn't it?
THE GOOD
-- Hmmm... Ahmad Bradshaw, maybe? He had a couple of nice runs when he finally got into the game on offense. If he can learn his protections better -- and let's be honest, if he'd been in there on passing downs, he would have gotten freight-trained like all the other secondary blockers who were in there -- he may have a shot to play more.
-- Osi. Six tackles, two sacks, one forced fumble that could have changed the game in the first quarter. A good recovery after a so-so day in Detroit.
-- Freddy Robbins. When he plays a lot, he plays really, really well. Had 1 1/2 sacks that should have been 2 1/2.
THE BAD
-- Eli, Eli, Eli, Eli. And to think I forgot to mention in my game story that he had a fifth pick that was correctly overturned on a challenge, and a sixth that went right into Ben Leber's arms but the Minny LB dropped it.
OK folks, the debates will begin anew on Eli and his worth. There's no defending yesterday, of course. He seems to have at least one game every season in which he's confused early by the defensive looks and then he falls apart trying to do too much. In three seasons, yesterday was by far the worst I've seen; the Baltimore game in '04 is a tale often told, but that's the Ravens, a terrific defense all the way around.
This is the Vikings, who have a terrible secondary and a front seven that hadn't been getting to QBs all year. We'll get to the O-line's failures in a moment.
I have defended Eli in the recent past, and I will defend him in the future. For this offense, he's a fine QB because he manages games well and is becoming a more accurate passer and a better defense-reader, yesterday aside. The Giants are not built for a gunslinging QB, as exciting as that sounds; the NFC East has one gunslinger, but that Romo guy has a great O-line, a terrific back in Barber and guys who catch the ball.
So when Eli is his usual, boring self, the Giants aren't bad. It's their defense that wins or loses their games and their seasons, as evidenced in recent seasons.
So... there's still no excuse for what Eli did yesterday. And yes, I put a heaping help of the blame on him, because some of those throws in the first half, when the game was still a game, were hideous. Beyond bad. And the whole offense lost confidence as a result.
-- The O-line. This could be the most worrisome aspect of yesterday going forward. The unit has been very good, and needed to be great yesterday because of the RB situation. It wasn't. Lotta breakdowns, lotta interior blitzes that were well-disguised, lotta Eli running for cover.
-- Reuben Droughns. He is who I thought he was: A very good short-yardage back who doesn't have the acceleration to be an every-down guy. Easy to say in hindsight, but I would have alternated Droughns and Bradshaw each series, especially after it became apparent that Eli couldn't hit water if he fell out of a boat.
-- Strahan. Can't let a sack and a tackle-for-loss go, much less on the same series. Ditto for Justin Tuck, who struggled for the first time all season.
-- Aaron Ross. Starting to play more like a rookie, it seems. The coverage on Sidney Rice's long TD catch was just bad, and the Vikes threw at Ross a few more times later.
-- TC. Won't fault him for leaving his starters in deep into the fourth, because he was right to say that meant giving up. I will fault him for some of the play calls and something we've all faulted him (and his offensive coordinators) for in the past 3-plus years: An inability to change the offense mid-game when things are going south. When he does it out of desperation (Philly and Seattle last year), he gets some results; when he thinks they're close enough to keep doing what they do (Jacksonville last year, San Diego two years ago), it just gets worse.
And the Bears are coming up on Sunday. They still play defense too. We'll see what's what out at Soldier Field.
Back with some more after availability in a few hours.