"It's going to be a long winter, Mets fans, so let's stop _ now _ the suggested trade packages for Johan Santana."
I wrote that in the October 7 edition of Newsday.
So how did I screw this up? Let us count the ways:
1) I figured that the Twins, if they couldn't get the high price they justifiably wanted for their ace, would have no qualms about sticking with Santana and making a very feasible World Series run in 2008. What I failed to anticipate was that the Twins, having completed their 2007 season in disappointing fashion, would not want to repeat the experience they had with impending free agent Torii Hunter.
You New York fans are accustomed to the "big-time player in his walk year" storyline. Shoot, in 2007 alone, we had Andy Pettitte, Jorge Posada, Mariano Rivera and Alex Rodriguez potentially leaving the Bronx, and Tom Glavine and Paul Lo Duca in Flushing. They know the deal: They're going to be asked about it, repeatedly. They answer the questions and move on.
Torii Hunter is one of the nicest guys in all of baseball. I was one of countless reporters last year who did the "Hunter on his free agency" story. When the Mets were at Shea Stadium, Hunter smiled and politely, colorfully answered about seven minutes' worth of questions.
And yet...for some reason, this freaked out the Twins. Frankly, it's a terrible reason for them to accept a low-ball package in return for arguably the game's greatest pitcher.
2) I underestimated how few teams would actually be willing to give up both the trading chips and money necessary to land Santana. The Yankees' interest waned once Andy Pettitte returned, and with that, so did the Red Sox's.
Perhaps the Mariners would have done it, yet it's pretty clear that Santana, who still makes his full-time home in Venezuela, preferred to be on the East Coast.
3) I underestimated the Twins' opinion of the Mets' prospects. It turns out that Joe McIlvaine, the former Mets general manager who is a respected voice in Minnesota, is high on Carlos Gomez. And the Twins tried to get Kevin Mulvey in last summer's trade for Luis Castillo.
4) I overestimated the savvy of new Twins GM Bill Smith. I am a fan of both Smith and his predecessor, Terry Ryan. But Smith terribly misread his potential trading partners. As I wrote in my column today, Smith clearly held the belief that Hank Steinbrenner would relent and give up a huge package. Yet no matter how much Hank blathered over the last month, there never existed even a remote chance that the Yankees were going to trade Melky Cabrera, Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy for Santana.
So that's that. I wanted to be accountable, because I hate people in my business who slither away from poor forecasts as if they never happened.
But in the far bigger picture, give credit to the Mets for their sticktoitiveness. Once they sign Santana _ and they're going to sign him, and I feel very confident about this prediction _ they'll have the best pitching staff in the National League East, and perhaps even the entire league. Spring training will be dominated not by talk of The Collapse, but talk of Santana.
Congrats, Mets fans. You deserved this one. And in the future, ignore my pleas to leave me alone.
The Baseball Assistance Team does a wonderful job of taking care of former players, executives, coaches, managers, umpires, scouts _ or any other member of the baseball world _ who have fallen on hard times financially. If you know of any such person, or if you just want to donate some money to a great cause, call B.A,T,'s Jim Martin at 212-931-7822.
Comments (8)
Hey Ken:
And on the seventh day, both Giuliani and Edwards bow out, the cows came home and the NL Eastern Division was decided in January. Congrats to all Mets fans!
~Howard
Congrats is right. A great day to be a Mets fan.
Ken-Don't be so hard on yourself. You are doing a great job. It was probably, in some way, your parents' fault
You're probably right, Steve.
Ken...as a die-hard Met fan I'm still pinching myeslf. Finally, there's joy in Mudville...Although I felt all along that the Twins really didn't want Santana pitching against them.
Hey Dave!!! Your common of sense is great! I ENJOY READ YOUR BLOG!
Ken, I didn't disagree with your ongoing analysis. The Twins got rolled. Obviously they thought by waiting they could play the Yanks and Boston off against each other but they let it go too long until each team realized the other wasn't ready to pull the trigger and there was no need to overpay. Personally, I am extremely pleased the Yankees didn't give away very good young talent or sign a pitcher to a 6 or 7 year contract. I am against contracts longer than 3 years. I accept the A-Rod deal as being in a league of its own, but was against a fourth year for Posada. The Yanks have been burned too many times by long deals. The Mets needed to make this trade much more than either the Yankees or Boston. The Twins could have gotten much more talent by making a deal earlier.
These things never work out. Though it really doesn't seem like the Mets gave up all that much here.
As for you being wrong...don't worry, we're getting used to it!! Just kidding, good job on the meaculpa. And I dont blame you, I blame the Twins GM for not getting more. I didn't think they would ever take this offer. They should have waited it out and traded Santana in May. They would have gotten much more...and if not, they would have had him for the whole season and got two first rounders.