Foley-Trunzo: Hit on HMO money (Updated)
A day after their debate, Brian Foley's campaign hits Caesar Trunzo for taking $66,000 in contributions from HMOs since 1999 and (Foley says) regularly voting on their side.
The release cites bills including one that would have mandated coverage of mammograms and cervical cancer screens for women, and another that would have imposed liability on HMOs for wrongful denial of care decisions. Also: A vote that would have required big employers like Wal-Mart to provide health coverage:
"Whenever there are legislative battles pitting insurance companies against every-day consumers struggling to pay their healthcare premiums, Trunzo's is a vote the insurance companies can and do count on."
Full text after the jump.
Update: Here's a response from the Trunzo campaign, via Republican Senate Campaign Committee spokesman Joe Conway:
“Brian ‘Tax’ Foley is obviously getting more and more negative with his attacks, because he’s desperately trying to shift attention away from his dismal record on property taxes.
“Whether it’s securing $500,000 in this year’s budget for a digital mammography unit at Southside Hospital, protecting our hospitals and nursing homes from budget cuts, increasing access to low cost prescription drugs for our seniors, or dramatically expanding Child Health Plus, Senator Trunzo clearly has an outstanding record when it comes to health care."
FOLEY RELEASE ON TRUNZO
As millions of New Yorkers continue to live without healthcare coverage and face an uncertain future, 36 year-incumbent Senator Caesar Trunzo is living large – off the money he collects from the healthcare industry. Financial records filed by Trunzo's own campaign indicate that he's been on the take from HMO's for years. Since 1999 alone, Trunzo has taken $66,000 from the healthcare industry.
While he's raking in big bucks from his friends in the health insurance field, Trunzo's failed leadership is resulting in millions of people lacking adequate health coverage. Trunzo, a member of the broken status quo that brought us the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, has a healthcare record an insurance company CEO can be proud of. Whenever there are legislative battles pitting insurance companies against every-day consumers struggling to pay their healthcare premiums, Trunzo's is a vote the insurance companies can and do count on.
Senator Trunzo voted against women and in favor of HMO's when he voted "No" on the Women's Health and Wellness Bill. The legislation sought to make insurance companies cover mammograms for women over 40. Despite the fact that Long Islanders face the highest rate of breast cancer in the United States, Senator Trunzo chose to side with insurance companies over prevention, the best defense against breast cancer. In addition to mammograms, the bill would have forced HMO's to cover cervical cancer screenings.
Senator Trunzo and his colleagues killed major legislation that would have held HMO's legally liable for the consequences of their decisions. Under the bill, patients who suffer pain, injuries, and even death because of the denial of care or delays in approving care would have the right to place the blame on the insurer, just as a patient would sue a physician for medical malpractice. Thanks to Trunzo's inaction, the bill died on the Senate Calendar.
"Senator Trunzo takes $66,000 from the healthcare industry; then protects the industry from having to care for sick New Yorkers," said Ibrahim Khan, Communications Director for the Foley for Senate campaign. "I think voters can connect the dots. Trunzo's failed policies of the past demonstrate that he's either unwilling or unable to stand up for us when it matters most."
Trunzo's voting pattern demonstrates his commitment to making sure his buddies in Big Business are always taken care of, even if it means his constituents can't go to the doctor's when they're sick. In a shocking vote, Trunzo voted against making Walmart and other large employers provide healthcare benefits to their employees. This, despite that fact that most of these corporations have multi-million dollar budgets and all of them employ at least 50 people.
"Brian X. Foley represents that change we need in Albany. He will reform healthcare, make sure all New Yorkers have quality, affordable health coverage, and hold HMO's accountable," said Khan.
Throughout his career in public service, Foley has stood strong for the health of Suffolk County residents. As County Legislator, Foley took on the tobacco industry – and won. As Brookhaven Town Supervisor, Foley outlawed smoking in public areas; protecting children from second-hand smoke and helping communities breathe cleaner air.
Foley will bring to Albany a proven record of changing government and a commitment to working families. In just two years as the Brookhaven Town Supervisor, he cut a $15 million deficit, got the town its highest bond rating ever, and saved taxpayers $10 million by ending years of no-bid contracts. Because of his hard work, Brookhaven now has the lowest town tax rate in Suffolk County.

Comments (5)
Spin, Spin, Spin from Foley.
What Foley should be asking is why Trunzo is not being supported by his own local party.
He has destroyed the once great Islip GOP with his cronies and even in the face of overwhelming vocal cries to pass the torch, he stubbornly grasps onto his (and McGowans, the Messina's and their payroll/deal cronies) power. Win loose or draw in the shocking betrayal of the NYS Senate Majority, Trunzo feels it is more important to partner up with SC GOP Chairman Withers and after the election, perpetuate a ballot box stuffing of proxies from appointed fake Committee People to steal the election of new leaders seeking to cleanse the Islip GOP.
This man has no shame and while the world would be worse with a Democratic Senate, we Republicans will NEVER forget what Trunzo pulled on every party member in the state by raising the stakes so high for a handful of has beens.
Trunzo has to go as Islip GOP leader, Withers has to go as SC GOP leader and most of the other leaders need to go, too. Vecchio in Smithtown has to go for endorsing a Democrat. This is getting ridiculous. The party needs new leadership on every single level. These guys couldn't win a one horse race. They have run the party into the ground over the past two decades and it will probably take at least a decade to build it back up again.
BUT, Foley is much worse than Trunzo and the Democrats are much worse than the GOP. SO, Trunzo has to win this election, and I continue to believe he will. Foley's latest HMO ad is nonsense, since the Assembly Dems took even more money. This is all politics. If Foley wins, the school districts in that Senate district can kiss millions of dollars in aid goodbye.
Trunzo has to GO....as the Romans said, kill them all and then sort out the bodies. Foley has to run again in two years, in that much time, with all of you watching him, he will behave himself. The problem here is because Trunzo was a good old boy none of you watched him closely. All of the GOPers are learning a lesson from all of this and that is corruption is not indemic to the Dems. Until you clean house none of this is going away and it is up to you to entirely clean house. Don't forget Cochrane in your group, when his son is free he will be pushing him for Town Supervisor. He has been on the teet just as long as Trunzo and is responsible for trashing the relationship with Conservative Party leadership that supported the GOP in Islip for more than twenty years.
I believe that Withers will keep his word and not fill committee vacancies until after the vote for the officers. The challengers will need their own election law savy attorney there to watch Vinnie Messina. It is up to the challengers to search the committee filings to see if they are legit. Send a letter to each electee with a
letter of declination and you will get rid of a lot that they file. Enclose an addressed envelope with a stamp to the SC BOE. Also if they take you to court demand that they posess certification from each committeeperson that they purport to represent that they represent them.
They can only fill vacancies in a district where there has been an election.