A new Quinnipiac poll finds Clinton stronger than Obama in three key states -- Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.
She beats McCain by healthy margins in all three. Obama beats him in Pennsylvania, and is statistically tied in Ohio and Florida. Which is, basically, her argument:
Why pick a candidate who promises new coalitions, when you've got one who can win Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania?
Comments (1)
Why pick a candidate who promises new coalitions, when you've got one who can win?