Hillary skeds: NAFTA
One of the few newsworthy tidbits to surface so far from the Hillary schedules is her attendance at a WH meeting to promote NAFTA in 1993. She now says she was always kind of against NAFTA, but attendees from the meeting of women involved in international trade who were tracked down by ABC remember differently:
"It wasn’t a drop-by it was organized around her participation. Her remarks were totally pro-NAFTA and what a good thing it would be for the economy. There was no equivocation for her support for NAFTA at the time. Folks were pleased that she came by. If this is a still a question about what Hillary's position when she was First Lady, she was totally supportive if NAFTA."
Another attendee says Clinton "asked for our support and help in passing NAFTA" and lots of those who were there are now "incredulous" at Clinton's recent claims: "They're all saying, 'What's this all about?' We all heard it firsthand."
Maybe there should be a re-vote in Ohio, too..... But read to the end. There's a little pushback from Clinton's camp.
E-mail
Facebook
Digg
Delicious
Comments (5)
As far as I'm concerned there should be a revote in Ohio regardless as thousands of Ohio voters were disinfranchised by Hillary lie about Obama's representative meeting with Canadians to tell them that wink wink NAFTA was just talk and that it would be business as usual--when in fact it was the CLINTONS representative who met with the Canadians.
Anyone who says that there were not thousands of Ohions who were not influence unduly by this lie are either Hillary supporters who believe in her win at any lie, or they are people who are not aware of what Clinton is really doing--all of which is straight out of a Karl Rove Playbook
Read this. Amazing.
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Bread%20and%20Circus
rwgnojf lsojc nbevlgsx flgempnad mucyw lmktrbvg rhpskwuxj
rwgnojf lsojc nbevlgsx flgempnad mucyw lmktrbvg rhpskwuxj
rwgnojf lsojc nbevlgsx flgempnad mucyw lmktrbvg rhpskwuxj