Bloggers

  • Dan Janison Politics Blog
    Dan Janison
  • Rick Brand Politics Blog
    Rick Brand
  • James Madore Politics Blog
    James T. Madore
  • glennthrush.jpg
    Glenn Thrush
  • craig gordon
    Craig Gordon
  • John Riley
  • Bill Murphy
  • Reid Epstein
  • Celeste Hadrick
  • Chau Lam
  • Tom Brune
  • Stacey Altherr
  • Erik German
  • Calvin Lawrence
  • Martin Evans
  • Carol Eisenberg
  • Melissa Mansfield

Blogroll

Powered by Movable Type 3.36
Hosted by LivingDot

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

« Chuck: I got prez debate for Hofstra | Main | Hillary's Hasselbeck Campaign »

Social Security: Hillary drops 'middle class' ref today

clintonobama533.jpeg

Is Hillary rethinking her definition of the middle class?

At last week's debate in Las Vegas (right), Barack Obama suggested increasing the $97,500 cap on wages subject to payroll taxes to get bigger earners to pay more to improve the financial outlook of the Social Security system.

Clinton (who favors a Social Security study commission) accused Obama of wanting to impose a $1 trillion tax "on the backs of middle class families and seniors." Obama said people making more than $97,500 are the top 6 percentile of wage earners in the US, hardly the middle class.

Today, in Iowa, Hillary continued her critique, but left out one thing: "We don't need more Republican scare tactics about a Social Security crisis. And we don't need a trillion-dollar tax increase that will hit families already facing higher energy, health care and college costs."

Notice, though -- no more "middle-class families."

At the debate, she tried to say firefighters and "school supervisors" made more than than $97,500. But -- maybe Mark Penn decided that was a little bit too NY standard of living, and made Hillary sound a little out of touch in Iowa, NH and Nevada. In any event -- no claim today that raising the cap would affect the 'middle class.'

Post a comment


Please enter the security code you see here

Video