Animal House

Thank you Denise for this post. I so totally agree. My dogs have their puppy shots and the one year booster and then no more except the rabies as the law requires. It is simply too hard on their systems.

No more shots for my doggies, after puppy shots,
a 1 yr booster, and rabies every 3 yrs which I
hate to do but it is the law in NJ. Both dogs
had their rabies shots today and they both seem
punky, even Fiona ( the wild child) is mellow
I hate vaccines. My vet told me today t hat
Meriel (sp) vaccines are known to cause cancer,
and to only use Fort Dodge, I am talking about
the rabies, I have no knowledge of any of the
other vaccines. Thanks for the info Denise

Sue:

Fort Dodge - I will remember that thanks.

Thanks for the tip Sue. I was not aware of that.

I feel the same exact way about my animals. Rabies is all they get now after the initial shots.

My Siamese cat had a tumor appear and it was at the exact spot where he had received vaccinations most of his life. That cured me of feeling "vaccination friendly!"

For some interesting views about the shelters in Memphis (sad I will warm you), here is a link. This lady does a wonderful column in Memphis called Pet Talk. I enjoy her articles very much. I especially love her for her strength in pushing for spay/neuter.

http://blogs.commercialappeal.com/pets/archives/2005/06/memphis_animal.html

RI also requires a rabies shot but the rest of the time my vet just does a titer test to check Harry's immunity. This is reccommend by Dr. Jean Dodds.

I have a holistic dog health care book that I refer to - and the writer warns about over vaccinations - the big money maker for Vets! (No offense to those good vets out there that also don't want pets over vaccinated.)

I used to cook homemade meals for all my dogs - but it wore me out - and almost bankrupted me - but still I think fresh cooked meals is the best. Of course, I added human grade bone meal to it, and imported Safflower Oil, and cooked the potatoes and ground beef first, then put the fresh carrots in a blender along with other veggies. The dogs loved it - but as I said it become more than I could handle, but so much better for them.

40-70% of the income of a general practice vet is vaccinations.

I just recently read that they are finding out the rabies vaccine lasts for 5 yrs.

If you really want your eyes to be opened concerning vaccines, in particular the dangers of the rabies vax, you should go to www.truthaboutvaccines.org. Go to the articles and READ!! Rabies vax causes a whole host of behavioral issues, too. So, if you have a dog with over the top behaviors, you can most probably thank the vaccine for that! The laws about rabies absolutely need to be changed. There is not a rabies epidemic out there as our vets would claim there to be. There is, however, a guarantee that our dogs will be harmed by the vaccine. If someone new learns this info. and makes a stand for the laws to be changed, we're that much closer to protecting our animals. Those furry friends who depend on US for their lives. Read anything and everything you can find about what the vets and lawmakers and pharma companies are asking us to do to our animals.

Thank you Denise for this post. I so totally agree.

Thanks for posting this entry. It is very relevant and informative especially for pet owners like me. I learned a lot from it.

-andrei
http://www.dogagilityequipment-4less.com/

vxgkqz ioswvkxe ghrzx ixkemrco eqfhxwgis obruakehz kqprodz

lceugqf vuqox jlyde sfvx guelp iqsrkuhnp zmhjls http://www.rlyoqc.ofap.com

Nice site. Thank you:-)
http://badcreditloans.corank.com student loans with bad credit

Nice site. Thank you:-)
http://badcreditloans.corank.com student loans with bad credit

http://blog.helpinganimals.com/2008/05/when_the_ends_dont_justify_the.php
This is really outrageous. As many of you know, I despise the fact that rabies vaccinations are required for dogs every three years and even annually in some states. I've read about all the adverse reactions and the belief of many holistic vets that rabies vaccinations confer immunity for a lifetime. Nobody would like to see the laws changed to allow dogs to be vaccinated for rabies less frequently more than I would. However, I draw the line at torturing animals in order to accomplish that.
Apparently, some people have no such scruples, such as two people whom I admired and respected up until recently, when I read the "Rabies Challenge Fund Charitable Trust Research Study" for which one of them is fundraising and the other is the principal investigator. In this study, two rather large groups of beagles (each with at least 35 members―it's not known exactly how many) will be isolated for five years or seven years, depending on the group; at least 25 of them will be vaccinated; and then they will all be injected with rabies virus to see who dies and who doesn't. The man doing the experiment is Ronald Schultz, D.V.M., chair of pathobiology at the University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine and an outspoken critic of the laws regarding rabies vaccinations, and the person raising the funds for the experiment is none other than W. Jean Dodds, D.V.M., a veteran of the holistic veterinary medical community. I find this terribly disturbing and hypocritical.

Death by rabies is ugly indeed. The virus infects the brain, causing encephalitis, and can also attack the spinal cord. There can be everything from fever and flu-like symptoms to anxiety, confusion, erratic behavior, aggression, disorientation, seizures, partial paralysis, coma, and death from respiratory arrest. One of the horrible aspects of the disease is that the jaw and throat become paralyzed, making it impossible to drink or even swallow one's own saliva, causing the characteristic drooling.
Of course, none of this is mentioned in Dodds' fundraising. I doubt that she would get a dime if it were. She is soliciting funds from dog lovers of all kinds, preying on their fears for their own dogs' health while totally misleading them. Her Web site and her flier contain not a single word about the negative aspects and gruesome details of the actual experiment. This is deceitful at best. The idea of torturing upwards of 70 dogs in order to improve the health of the rest of the dog population is no different from deciding to torture 70 children in order to improve the health of other children. Those 70 dogs matter! Each one matters! None of them wants to die a horrible death, be killed prematurely, or spend their entire life in a kennel.

We all want our own dogs to be healthy, but people with true compassion don't want that to be at the expense of any other dogs. I'm sorry to have to say it, but in this experiment, the ends, as laudable as they are, do not justify the means.
A better way to spend the $1.25 million being raised for these experiments would be to develop an acceptable serological method to test for rabies antibodies and immunity to the rabies virus.
If you agree, why not shoot Dr. Dodds an e-mail at hemopet@hotmail.com and let her know how you feel?

It's interesting that the Rabies Challenge Fund folks are now saying they will attempt to make changes to the protocol after the experiments have begun on beagles (even though it is highly unlikely the USDA will agree to that since the experiments have already begun). So it is still likely that many dogs will die and many will die excruciating deaths.

As far as I can tell, RCF has made no attempts to date to get a serological protocol approved. The experiments being conducted by RCF are purely elective. Why not design a tenable serological protocol that can be approved by USDA? A serological method would allow data to be collected from volunteers rather than dogs stuck in a laboratory. Why were none of these efforts made before PETA began to shine a spotlight on the myriad of problems with RCF's plans?

With regards to RCF's statement that PETA should be working on this issue, we are indeed working on non-animal protocols for vaccine testing at both the USDA and the FDA. PETA has spent more than a quarter million dollars in recent years to develop non-animal testing methods. We're very happy to put our money where our mouth is!

Despite repeated requests, the RCF folks have refused to provide details including:

. the actual number of dogs involved in each study. The USDA gives only the minimum number of dogs that they must have data for at the culmination of the study, so logically RCF must use more dogs than the USDA's minimum of 70. However, RCF will not even answer this simple question.

. the conditions and socialization for the dogs. Dodds referred PETA to USDA's protocol for this information. USDA's protocol does not specify that dogs should be socialized or that they should receive toys or even a bed.

. how and when the dogs would be killed. RCF referred PETA to the USDA protocol for this information. USDA's protocol stipulates that even vaccinated dogs are to be killed and their brains examined. This is in direct contradiction RCF's current claim that it will adopt out the dogs who don't die.

RCF makes it appear that dogs will be killed at the first signs of rabies. Rabies is painful and its symptoms can begin quietly. Dogs will likely die of painful complications related to paralysis and inability to breathe.

No one is disputing how the immune system works and that dogs are most likely being over-vaccinated in many ways. However, a way to combat this is not to launch yet another study that will kill even more dogs.

Much more good could have come from an effort to change the way rabies vaccine efficacy is tested rather than to use more than $1 million to kill beagles.

We encourage the RCF to do better! They could not be doing much worse.

PETA and EUTHANASIA --4/28/08 NEWSWEEK ARTICLE

PETA member, Samantha Dozier, failed to disclose the following in her post.

April 28, 2008 Newsweek article entitled PETA and Euthanasia by Jeneen Interlandi http://www.newsweek.com/id/134549

"Since 1998 PETA has killed more than 17,000 animals, nearly 85 percent of all those it has rescued."

Ms. Dozier and other PETA members have been targeting The Rabies Challenge Fund for about a week. Attacking The Rabies Challenge Fund, which seeks to save thousands of dogs' lives by funding research with the goal of extending state-mandated rabies vaccine boosters to 5 and then 7 years will not change USDA vaccine licensing standards (which all 13 licensed rabies vaccines for dogs have gone through -- Fort Dodge, Merial, Schering-Plough, Intervet).

If PETA were truly concerned about dogs' lives, they would channel their concerns constructively and launch a massive petition to the USDA to get them to change their vaccine-licensing standards. Every member of The Rabies Challenge Fund team would applaud such a movement.

Dog owners who would like to see PETA petition the USDA to change their Code of Federal Requirements , Title 9, part 113.209 , please contact PETA member Bob Chorush at bob2001@verizon.net and let him know how you feel.

Below is a copy of Dr. Dodds' response to two other PETA members who have contacted her with concerns.

Unfortunately, this information from PETA is terribly misleading. See below. We've tried to have a dialog with PETA about their RCF concerns and so hope that they now understand what we're doing and why. We appreciate your concern about the way in which we must conduct the RCF Research Study. Please allow me to explain the regulatory requirements we must follow as specified by the Code of Federal Requirements, USDA , Title 9, part 113.209. We cannot get a new rabies vaccine licensed by the government with the extended booster periods of 5 and eventually 7 years unless we strictly follow these regulatory requirements. The protocol is not up to us .

The Rabies Challenge Fund is designed to prove to UDSA authorities that dogs only need two booster rabies vaccines in their lifetime. This would significantly reduce the tragedies outlined below, save countless animal pain and suffering, and still protect the public health.

The public has little understanding of how all vaccines must be tested through USDA -specified trials before they are licensed for veterinary use. Every currently licensed rabies vaccine has been required to successfully complete these specified trials; and these vaccines as you know are required by law.

Only purebred beagles raised in a dog breeding facility run by veterinarians are involved in our project. This a large USDA licensed facility maintained in strict compliance with animal care and use requirements. The dogs live in large pens and are housed together in small groups for socialization and exercise. Further socialization is provided by their caretakers.

Today, we have a formidable uphill battle compounded by inertia in trying to change outdated rabies regulations to reflect what is truly needed to protect animals and people from contracting rabies. The federal government is just not interested in promoting a uniform requirement throughout the country that rabies booster vaccinations be given every three years. A few individual states and locales still insist on mandating annual rabies boosters when these vaccines are licensed for three years by the USDA. The recent media furor over the annual rabies booster mandate by the city of Wichita, KS is but one example.

While this travesty continues under the rubrick of state's rights, countless companion animals suffer from being required to receive rabies boosters even when they're terminally ill, debilitated, very old or have a record of prior serious adverse reaction to vaccination. This usually occurs when veterinarians either don't believe that adverse events occur or are likely, or they use the excuse that they're merely following the law. This situation is further complicated when local or state authorities will not accept waivers of booster requirement even with a veterinary letter of justification and/or a rabies antibody titer beyond the 1:5 titer level deemed by CDC to be adequate for people. Just today, a distraught caregiver was faced with having to revaccinate a middle aged dog with prior history of collapse after rabies vaccine. The dog's rabies antibody titer was 1: 3125, six hundred times that required for people, and yet the local authorities refused to grant a waiver.

These all too common occurrences have resulted in an increasing number of people simply breaking the law and not vaccinating their dogs at all. However, IF these dogs injure someone, even accidentally, and they're quarantined without evidence of an in-date rabies vaccination, the public health authorities have the right to require surety and direct that the animal be killed; his/her head is then examined for rabies. One such tragedy where a family was not given the chance to appeal on behalf of their dog is in litigation as we speak.

Then, there are the heartbreaking adverse reactions and deaths that occur when animals are forced to be given rabies boosters in lieu of waivers, when justified, and the dog seizures uncontrollably and dies in the caregiver's arms. Such a case also happened this past week.

Best wishes. With reverence for all life. Jean

More information on this subject from Dr. Dodds below responding to another PETA Member's inquiry. None of the research dogs will be allowed to develop full-blown rabies (see below) and the vaccinates will survive and can be adopted out.

1. Question: How many dogs actually suffer, per year, to make purposely killing 70 pure bread beagles acceptable?

Dr. Dodds' Reply: It has been estimated that the adverse reaction rate of aerious nature to rabies vaccinations is in the order of 0.38- 0. 50 % , with another 1-3% of vacinates experiencing less severe reactions. of the millions of dogs thatr must be vacinated by law annually.

2. Question: How long does the dog suffer with obvious rabies before he is humanely euthanized?

Dr. Dodds' Reply: Not at all ; as soon as any relevant sign is noted with round-the-clock coiverage --- at the end of the 5 and 7 year trials -- when all the dogs must be challenged with rabies virus, they are humanely sacrificed. We expect that all the non-vaccinated dogs will become ill, and that vaccinates will survive. BUT, as all these dogs will be just housed in large family style group pens, cared for and socialized for the entire trial period, without any exposure challenge to rabies virus until the end of the study, we have at least 4 years of their routine husbandry and care in which to dialog with the respoonsible USDA authorities to ask them to consider an alternative endpoint to the trial -- for example, allowing us to run rabies vaccine serolgy titers as proff of adequartete protection from rabies rather than an actual live rabies virus challenge. Dr. Schultz and I are both personally committed to work towards changing the current requirements before the end of the trials.

3. Question: What makes you believe that if an owner does not vaccinate their dog every three years because of the reaction the dog may have to the vaccination, that that same owner WILL get the dog vaccinated every five years?

Dr. Dodds' Reply: We don't, but, if the law is changed , then a dog will only need one more booster in midlife and none in old age - a biger isue if they're frail or ill. Also, remember that some states and locales within states still madate annual rabies boosters ! In Wichita, KS and Cheyenne, WY a huge recent blitz of officials challenging their ignorant position of annual rabies vaccination resulted in the city ordinances being changed for the future. Much of this effort was spearheaded by Kris Christine and the RCF. .

Question: As we all know, there’s a fine line between scientific experiments that are worthwhile for the benefits of those in the future and there are those experiments that are more harmful than what will benefit anyone in the long run! I am a firm believer that the end must justify the means and I, at this point, am not convinced that the ends of this experiment justifies the means, mainly due to the fact that I’m unsure as to how many animals, per year, truly suffer from five vaccinations in their lifetimes, rather than just three !

Dr. Dodds' Answer: Rabies vaccine is the strongest of all vaccines available today, and so elicits the highest likelihood of adverse events , including death. I deal with these tragedies almost every day from all over North America -- as does Dr. Schultz.

Actually, this is what does and will happen -- once a rabies vaccine is licensed for 5 years, a puppy would receive 2 initial doses, and then one more dose 5 years after the second one. IF we can show that a rabies vaccine can be effective and licensed for 7 years, then the dog will require one more vaccine 7 years after the second one. As it now stands, dogs are required to get a rabies booster either annually or every three years after the second one -- depending on the applicable state or local laws, and so when these privately cared for dogs become older and ill or frail - even with life-threatening diseases, most states and locales refuse to grant exemptions from rabies boosters even with justification provided by the primary care veterinarian and/or a high level of rabies antibody titer.

PETA--OVER 90% PUT TO DEATH -- Channel 3 News Story Kentucky

From Channel 3 News in Kentucky May 7, 2008: http://www.ky3.com/news/trends/?feed=bim&id=18743839

OVER 90 PERCENT PUT TO DEATH

WASHINGTON -- An official report filed by People for The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) with the Virginia government shows that the organization put to death more than 90 percent of the dogs, cats, and other pets it took in for adoption during 2007.